
Can a AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT run Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy?
The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT handles Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy comfortably — roughly 235 FPS at 1080p and 146 FPS at 1440p on high settings.
High preset, upscaling off, paired with a AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D-class processor.
How the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT measures up
| Requirement | AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT | Minimum | Recommended | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU performance score | 55 | 1 | 15 | Recommended |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 0 GB | 4 GB | Recommended |
| Ray tracing | ✓ Supported | Game has no RT | N/A | |
| Upscaling | FSR | Not supported | N/A | |
Recommended settings
For 60 FPS at 1080p
Use the ultra preset. You already clear 60 FPS on high, so this leaves headroom for dips in busy scenes.
At 1440p
Comfortable — around 146 FPS on high.
At 4K
Around 85 FPS on high — genuinely viable.
How other cards handle Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy
| Graphics card | Tier | 1080p FPS | vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT | A | 257 | ▲ 22 FPS | Compare |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT | A | 253 | ▲ 18 FPS | Compare |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | A | 248 | ▲ 13 FPS | Compare |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | A | 244 | ▲ 9 FPS | Compare |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | A | 235 | ▼ 0 FPS | Compare |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | A | 230 | ▼ 5 FPS | Compare |
Frequently asked questions
Can the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT run Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy?
The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT handles Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy comfortably — roughly 235 FPS at 1080p and 146 FPS at 1440p on high settings.
What FPS will I get?
On high settings with upscaling off: roughly 235 FPS at 1080p, 146 FPS at 1440p and 85 FPS at 4K. These are modelled estimates — see our methodology.
What settings should I use?
Start at the ultra preset at 1080p.
Will my processor hold this back?
These figures assume a processor fast enough not to limit the card. If yours is older, run the bottleneck calculator — this title leans on the GPU, so a modest CPU deficit costs less.