Can a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti run No Man's Sky?

Yes — comfortably

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti handles No Man's Sky comfortably — roughly 1212 FPS at 1080p and 751 FPS at 1440p on high settings.

1212FPS @ 1080p
751FPS @ 1440p
436FPS @ 4K

High preset, upscaling off, paired with a AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D-class processor.

How the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti measures up

RequirementNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 TiMinimumRecommendedResult
GPU performance score 35 2 2 Recommended
Video memory 8 GB 3 GB GB Recommended
Ray tracing ✓ Supported Game has no RT N/A
Upscaling DLSS, FSR DLSS, FSR Available

Recommended settings

For 60 FPS at 1080p

Use the ultra preset. You already clear 60 FPS on high, so this leaves headroom for dips in busy scenes.

At 1440p

Comfortable — around 751 FPS on high.

At 4K

Around 436 FPS on high — genuinely viable.

Upscaling

No Man's Sky supports DLSS and FSR. Your card supports DLSS — Quality mode is the best first change you can make. Compare upscalers.

How other cards handle No Man's Sky

Graphics cardTier1080p FPSvs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB B 1357 ▲ 145 FPS Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti B 1357 ▲ 145 FPS Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB B 1321 ▲ 109 FPS Compare
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT B 1321 ▲ 109 FPS Compare
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT B 1212 ▼ 0 FPS Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop B 1175 ▼ 37 FPS Compare

Frequently asked questions

Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti run No Man's Sky?

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti handles No Man's Sky comfortably — roughly 1212 FPS at 1080p and 751 FPS at 1440p on high settings.

What FPS will I get?

On high settings with upscaling off: roughly 1212 FPS at 1080p, 751 FPS at 1440p and 436 FPS at 4K. These are modelled estimates — see our methodology.

What settings should I use?

Start at the ultra preset at 1080p. Then enable upscaling on Quality mode before lowering anything further.

Will my processor hold this back?

These figures assume a processor fast enough not to limit the card. If yours is older, run the bottleneck calculator — this title is unusually CPU-heavy, so it matters more than usual here.